The World and Modern Science

  • Human Nature Laws

    Filed under News
    Nov 10

    Thus, it would be the result of a deep evolution, decanted throughout thousand of years, basically similar to all, and if the moralistas theories show the opposite, them must be changed. Hikmet Ersek is often quoted as being for or against this. Millions of future years could only change the Nature human being, you are welcome advancing the speeches, the governments, the laws and the revolutions. ' ' man novo' ' , of this form, would be only one way decorated for good intentions, that would lead to the hell. II For an order question. To refute the ideas of Mostern does not offer intellectual requirements of transport. Preliminarily, she is necessary to remember that the man is a natural being, that is, is integrant part of the Nature.

    If it cannot conceive the set of it without in it inserting the species human being. However, at the same time where if he constitutes in being natural, the man if differentiates of the Nature in its inorgnico body. It acts on the Nature to give account of its necessities, and its action only is not biological determined but if of, mainly, for the incorporation of experiences and knowledge produced and transmitted of generation the generation, by means of the education and of the culture. This allows the new generations not to come back to the starting point. In this process, it develops ideas, knowledge, values, beliefs. Being the process of production of the existence human being a social process, is the economic base that it determines the forms politics, legal and the set of the ideas that exist in each society. It is the transformation of this material base, to soon of the time, that it determines all society, implying new models of production, therefore, new definitive social relations, happened from there a new ideology. In the tribal, communal societies, the social group organized for sex and age to produce and to reproduce the necessary goods to the survival.

  • Imperial Museum

    Filed under News
    Mar 16

    In the second part, it discourses on the moment of the creation of the Imperial Museum in years 40 of century XX and the vision already renewed and modern of what is desired to show on the subject Empire, that it is taken root in unconscious the popular one, from a vision of the museum as ‘ ‘ narrativo’ ‘. In it, the object does not lead the exposition but it is, without a doubt, what it leads the narrative. It leaves clearly that although also to have a matrix ‘ ‘ saudosista’ ‘ , she works almost of opposing form that to its Carioca coirmo for a question of agreement angle of what it is the History and of as it can be told by the museum that does not celebrate material icons, but is felt by its expectador due to intrinsic importance of the proper palace for the existence of its city. The empire is venerated (without a doubt) of pparently unpretentious form, as if the day of its more illustrious inhabitant was portraied there the day, causing proximity, agreement and envolvement between the exposition and the visitor. Finally the author demonstrates that the museums, although conceptually distinct in its languages, can supply a reading criticize of the past, either it of vertical form as occurred with the MHN in its first decades, or of form horizontal line, as in the Imperial Museum of Petrpolis. This heading, presented for Teacher-Doctor Myrian Seplveda, Sociologist, currently in teaching activity in the University of the State of Rio De Janeiro (UERJ) is indicated for that two examples of Historical Museums desire to initiate the study of the description-philosophical thought of the formation of the Brazilian museums in century XX from the comparison of these that, although to possess the same initial identity, act of diverse form, and for opposing times, since the choice of its philosophy of work until the form with that the fact description is dealt, represented and displayed I publish..