Yalnizca

THE society of the knowledge and the education is no doubt that the knowledge society is reflected in the field of education faced challenges and struggles by the changes in the economy, society and knowledge. We live in an increasingly populous local planet and the world we are heading towards a globalization universal, facing a very uneven economic and cognitive growth. Get access to knowledge without exclusions would allow education to play a specific role in the realization of help to understand the world and to understand the other so likewise understand. Educational systems must always be at the forefront in order to respond to the many challenges that the information society issues, to obtain a continuous enrichment of knowledge demanded by our times, always taking into account the impact that must be addressed by technical progress; wanting to say that education should not be missed no opportunity that offers society if we really want a change and a revolution in education must begin in cementing their bases taking the pillars that mentions Juan Carlos Tedesco and facing these challenges: learning to learn which refers to the educational challenges from the perspective of cognitive development which should be an element always present and learn to live together; developing an understanding of the other and the perception of forms of interdependence understanding this challenge in achieving a social order to live coherent without losing our identity, education being a counterweight to capitalism. The State has the responsibility main and may establish, democratic and consensual mind the pedagogic objectives and regulate the educational service aimed to build a fairer, more autonomous and more supportive society, translating and expanding rights, warranties, duties and opportunities in effective and specific capabilities. Education is conceived as a powerful tool in the hands of the States for the construction of national projects the establishment of a social order and relies on these ensure the success of this process. Consequently, education is at a difficult crossroads, on the one hand it has to face difficult conditions, since it gathers within itself the specific problems of a society in conflict, with complicated situations of violence, poverty and hunger. Added to this it requires high levels of academic training, full coverage and quality of service. Education then faced a double challenge, firstly a pedagogical challenge with normal obligations that must confront the school and a second challenge, one social, to intervene effectively in the problems affecting society..

We start from article 41 of the Constitution which establishes the following obligation: public authorities shall maintain a public Social security scheme for all citizens, guaranteeing assistance and social benefits sufficient to situations of need, especially in the case of unemployment. Assistance and supplementary benefits will be free. Social services focus on collective concrete that are related to family problems of the elderly, depressive problems, situation of dependency, disabilities, problems of alcoholism, addiction to drugs, ethnic minorities, immigrants, membership of racial or religious minorities, etc., i.e., concerning particularly sensitive data. The majority of the public systems of social services of the autonomous communities are structured in two levels of support: primary and specialized. Both levels of assistance are characterized by handling personal data which, as we say, are not merely identification, academic, economic, etc. but that by its quality can affect the intimate nucleus of the person. We understand that it is essential that public employees staff know in advance what information must be collected for entry in a particular Centre.

For example, for input into a senior citizens Center has come to ask (as noted by the Agency of protection of data of the community of Madrid) by good or bad relations that the applicant has with her children. Public services identified by the Agency of protection of data of the community of Madrid: for applicants and beneficiaries: the management of funds of social assistance and integration income. The demand for places in care centres list management. The granting and management of specific individual aid. In the direct provision of services to residents and citizens users of centres: the overall management of residents and users. The health records of residents (physicians, nurses, reports psychological). The records social or occupational therapy. Only those workers social that participate in attendance (and access where necessary to the exercise of the tasks that they have mandated) should have access to social history.

Access to social history should be considered nominative form or by professional profiles, differentiating documents that are accessible by health care professionals and personnel administration and management, in a manner such that you can control who has access to which document. On the other hand, the duty of secrecy of professionals (both health professionals as management staff) is of particular importance. Think of phone calls that carried out to know if certain person is entered in a care center. The principle of data quality extends to the whole process of data processing in the field of social services. As we know from other articles published by Audea, this principle imposes obligations not only to the responsible of the file but also to the workers and to social service users themselves. In the area of specially protected data is especially important this principle of quality for how that data which is not appropriate and relevant should not be treated. Ultimately, public administration provided by social services are in the position to communicate especially protected data. Therefore, as we have pointed out on other occasions, needed to request the express written consent of especially protected data communication. It is also necessary to public administration bodies to communicate data complying with the principle of quality. Finally, and as it is logical, the transfer of personal information is authorized (without the consent of the / citizen/a) to the public prosecutor and judges and courts, to the tax administration, the social services inspectorate.