Yalnizca The World and Modern Science
  • Renaissance

    Filed under News
    Sep 30

    The proper way of breaking a rule is to transform it. The comparison of academic concepts with others that are not framed in standards is present in all areas of professional work. Achieve often tacit agreement unite modes and let them be, is the best strategy to grow. The history of our civilization has left us many names of men and women who have broken rules, to transform them into successful ways to carry out a task. These successes always have finished replacing the previous rules, and have positioned themselves as the new regulations for the action. If we were to graph this growth process, we would do with spirals out and forward, where the fall of the line represents the debacle of the old rule and the rise would be the transformation towards a new more effective standard.

    It is clear, the process is circular, has the necessary setback for the analysis of change, and the inevitable advance of doing. Critico-analitico thought vs. synthetic thinking the Renaissance and humanism they have been at its philosophical movements which led to the encyclopedic an relevant in all professions and trades. Even until the 19th century, the critico-analitico thought was the most successful for the action. In the mid-19th century emerges a way of new, symmetrical to the circumstances, thinking that in opposition to the critico-analitico thought resolves the action in a more simple way. This coincides with the massive emergence and expansion in the 20th century, the Oriental culture and minimalist, as with the appearance of large scale technological advances.

    Today is essential to synthesize, i.e., minimize the ideas in concepts simple and linear. Synthetic thinking unites technology that tries to facilitate all activities everyday and working with the way of resolving them successfully: fast and good. Myth in the synthetic thinking, the ways to achieve the objectives do not have the importance that critico-analitico thought gave them. From this point of view, arises a myth, which is to think that who achieves success does so by arrangement or money. While these two factors may influence to some extent, what really defines how successful action is the result of this and the rapidity with which it is reached.

    Tagged as:

Comments are closed.